Re: Boost downloads and JFrog

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2024-01-10 15:24:56

Robert Ramey wrote:
> This would in practice eliminate the concept of Boost version 1.84 etc... and
> replace with Boost Serialization library version 1, ...

For most intents and purposes, Boost releases _are_ Boost. If we eliminate
the concept of Boost release 1.84, what remains already exists and is called
Github.

> Boost would migrate from being a single/monolithic library to a group of
> libraries with some explicit dependencies (on other boost librarys, standard
> library or ?).

Boost would migrate into nothing.