Re: Is there an interest for an async JSON-RPC library in boost ?

From: Richard Hodges (hodges.r_at_[hidden])
Date: 2024-04-11 14:25:08

One of the exchanges I connect to uses JSON-RPC 2.0.

I might find it useful.

On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 at 21:23, Quentin Chateau via Boost <
boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> A couple of years ago, I wrote packio, a library implementing asynchronous
> client and server for msgpack-rpc. Over time it evolved into something more
> generic, an async implementation of the JSON-RPC (https://www.jsonrpc.org/
> )
> spec with customizable serialization.
>
> It is built on top of asio, and boost.json is supported serializer. This
> means that with minimal efforts it could evolve into an implementation of
> JSON-RPC with no dependencies outside of boost - yet extendable.
>
> My question then is: is there an interest for it ? I'd probably need to
> invest a non trivial amount of time into making it boost-compliant and
> following up on the review process, so I'm wondering whether it is worth it
> or not.
>
> Note that there are two known limitations in my library:
> - No support for batch mode
> - No support for sharing a transport between a client and a server (not
> part of the spec, but requested by some users)
>
> I'm looking forward to get the community's opinion. You can check my
> library on GitHub (https://github.com/qchateau/packio). Feedback on either
> community's interest for such library, or plain comments on the library are
> welcome !
>
> Quentin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>