Re: Option 1: Alliance stewardship of Boost

From: pdimov_at_[hidden]
Date: 2024-08-06 12:24:38

Vinnie Falco wrote:
> 5. When the Boost community cannot achieve consensus, the responsibility
> for making a directional decision shall pass to the Boost Software Commons
> (“Commons”), a 501(c)(3) non-profit registered in Delaware on March 1,
> 2024, which is not controlled by the Alliance and whose board currently
> consists of Boost authors. The Commons is now in hibernation until it is
> needed.

I don't think this is necessary. Historically, outsourcing our decision making
to some external entity has never worked, but even if it did, I don't see why
we'd need a registered nonprofit for that.