Re: [hash2] Formal Review Begins

From: Ion Gaztañaga (igaztanaga_at_[hidden])
Date: 2024-12-10 20:48:04

El 10/12/2024 a las 1:47, Peter Dimov via Boost escribió:
> Peter Turcan wrote:
>> 1. Just a little confused as to the name "Hash2" when there is no "Hash1" ?
>> Perhaps this was explained earlier and I missed it.
> 
> "Hash1" is the library formerly known as Functional/Hash, and now named
> ContainerHash. It defines the function object boost::hash.
> 
> (Whereas Hash2 defines its stuff in namespace boost::hash2.)

Since Hash2 depends on ContainerHash for several traits and functions 
both have the same dependencies (Config, Assert, Describe, Mp11), and 
both are about hashing... Wouldn't make sense to merge both libraries 
into a single Hash library?

Best,

Ion