Re: [ublas] [bindings] Routine with 4 workarrays

Subject: Re: [ublas] [bindings] Routine with 4 workarrays
From: Rutger ter Borg (rutger_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-01-19 16:17:42

Thomas Klimpel wrote:

> So there is no need to change the (confusing) typedef right now, but it
> would probably be a good idea to translate function pointers in a less
> confusing way to void*. ("const void* select" would be less confusing for
> me than "logical_t* select" for "SELECT  (external procedure) LOGICAL
> FUNCTION of one COMPLEX argument")

functor_t would make sense to me, perhaps allowing our users to pass
function objects and/or the use of boost::bind? 

Good news -- as of now, all ~80 generated driver routines pass compiler
inspection! I'll look into the tabs tomorrows and put it on-line.

Cheers,

Rutger