From: JÃ¼rgen Hunold (hunold+lists.Boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-07-28 09:02:44
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hi Volodya !
On Monday 28 July 2003 11:45, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> > I must confess I'm a bit confused. I've just tested current bjam
> > with 2003-07-09, which works well. current bjam with last
> > available CVS does not.
> So, the problem is not in "bjam", but in Boost.Build proper?
> Interesting... Maybe, you can try the Boost.Build states of
> 2003-07-20, 2003-07-21 and 2003-07-22? That's the point where a large
> number of M6 changes was made.
Well, I think I got it.
The change has be between 2003-07-18 and 2003-07-19.
(cvs co -D 2003-07-18 etc.)
It's definitely a boost-build problem. I've tested this with current
bjam and bjam from 2003-07-09. The same behaviour ;-(
The memory consumption goes up, as does the number of targets ...
The target number increases from 25.000 to 36.000, while the memory
usage goes up from 250 MB to 1350 MB.
> It's not that good that I'm taking your time for doing binary search
> in time, but the problem happends only on your project.
For I'm developing on Win32 at the moment, my linux-box can do most of
the "work" alone (waiting for SF checkouts....)
When you need more information, drop me a hint. I'll look into this
tomorrow. Unfortunately, I'll be on vacation from wednesday on until
* Dipl.-Math. JÃ¼rgen Hunold ! Institut fÃ¼r Verkehrswesen, Eisenbahnbau
* voice: ++49 511 762-2529 ! und -betrieb, UniversitÃ¤t Hannover
* fax : ++49 511 762-3001 ! Appelstrasse 9a, D-30167 Hannover
* hunold_at_[hidden] ! www.ive.uni-hannover.de
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk