Re: [jamboost] Re: bjam --version

From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-28 00:11:13

Christopher Currie wrote:
> >>Both Boost.Build
> >>and Boost.Jam must be from the same time to work reliably. Either from
> >> some release [or] from the same CVS state.
>
> I've been bitten by this problem once or twice. I notice that the
> NORMALIZE_PATH builtin was added to bjam around 3 weeks ago, but
> patchlevel.h hasn't been updated in 8 weeks. If the latest version of
> BBv2 requires NORMALIZE_PATH, perhaps the thing to do is increment the
> bjam version to 3.1.7, and bump kernel/bootstrap.jam appropriately?

Hi Christopher,
yes, that's the right idea and in fact I try to do this for all releases. 
Simply, I had no time to increment version number before I left for vacation, 
so it's still 3.1.6. It will be incremented shortly.

Sorry for inconvenience,
Volodya