From: Pedro Ferreira (pedro.ferreira_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-13 12:29:45
> Since we are going down this path
Could you elaborate on this, please?
> here are some comments...
> * Instead of having possibly many math operation builtins it would be
> to have a single builting to do simple math:
> rule CALC ( expression + )...
> For now just supporting a "+" would be fine, example:
> local v = [ CALC 1 + 2 ] ;
Ok. I'll give it a try tomorrow.
> * Stick to using standard C functions, i.e. don't use _itoa as it won't be
> generaly available. Replacing it with a sprintf would be best .
Right. When I wrote it I remembered I had to make it portable but then I
Thanks for your comments,
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk