Re: [jamboost] darwin-tools.jam and feature names

From: Rene Rivera (grafik.list_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-28 11:54:27

David Abrahams wrote:
> I notice darwin-tools.jam defines several features with *very*
> generic names (e.g. "warnings"). That's a big mistake because any
> other toolset might define the same feature name. These should
> either go in features.jam or be qualified (e.g. darwin-warnings). I
> prefer the former.

Yep, I agree. Yea, I know I'm the one that did that ;-)

But I've been waiting for the release to do some cleanup of BBv1, like the 
above. And work on the names of toolsets, and add detection of installed tools 
(hopefully shared with BBv2), and work on the testing XML output.

-- 
-- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com
-- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com - 102708583/icq