Boost-Build :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Rene Rivera (grafik.list_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-08-02 09:46:53

Next message: aneubeck2004: "Re: STLPort without iostreams gets wrongly named in bjam v1"
Previous message: Rene Rivera: "Re: [jamboost] STLPort without iostreams gets wrongly named in bjam v1"
In reply to: Rene Rivera: "Re: [jamboost] STLPort without iostreams gets wrongly named in bjam v1"
Next in thread: aneubeck2004: "Re: STLPort without iostreams gets wrongly named in bjam v1"
Reply: aneubeck2004: "Re: STLPort without iostreams gets wrongly named in bjam v1"

Rene Rivera wrote:

> So in a way it's doing the correct things. But it's also misleading.

PS. One possible "fix" is to remove all that code, and let the
compilation fail if one specifies <stlport-iostreams>off.

Thoughts?

-- 
-- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com
-- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com - 102708583/icq

Next message: aneubeck2004: "Re: STLPort without iostreams gets wrongly named in bjam v1"
Previous message: Rene Rivera: "Re: [jamboost] STLPort without iostreams gets wrongly named in bjam v1"
In reply to: Rene Rivera: "Re: [jamboost] STLPort without iostreams gets wrongly named in bjam v1"
Next in thread: aneubeck2004: "Re: STLPort without iostreams gets wrongly named in bjam v1"
Reply: aneubeck2004: "Re: STLPort without iostreams gets wrongly named in bjam v1"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk