Re: STLPort without iostreams gets wrongly named in bjam v1

From: aneubeck2004 (aneubeck_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-08-02 10:03:59

> Rene Rivera wrote:
> 
> > So in a way it's doing the correct things. But it's also misleading.
> 
> PS. One possible "fix" is to remove all that code, and let the 
> compilation fail if one specifies <stlport-iostreams>off.
> 
> Thoughts?

Another solution would be:
keep the code and add a warning for the user
(something like: <stlport_iostreams>off is not supported with ...)