From: Andrey Melnikov (melnikov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-12 08:27:54
Alexey Pakhunov wrote:
> Andrey Melnikov wrote:
>>What is your general impression? Is this decoupling approach promising?
>>Is it better than we have now, or worse?
> This looks good. It definitely has advantages over the current one. I'll
> will review it more carefully and post my comments a bit closer to the
> next weekend. (Sorry, I can't do it earlier).
Now the following subpatches have the highest priority:
3. configurations class
4. modification of check-init-parameters rule
5. new configure rule
Do you think that my ideas are going to change these patches? What is
the status of these patches?
Are they blocked just due to the lack of feedback from David and Volodya?
Can you repost them here, each one in a separate thread?
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk