From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-13 06:14:44
On Monday 12 September 2005 17:27, Andrey Melnikov wrote:
> Alexey Pakhunov wrote:
> > Andrey Melnikov wrote:
> >>What is your general impression? Is this decoupling approach promising?
> >>Is it better than we have now, or worse?
> > This looks good. It definitely has advantages over the current one. I'll
> > will review it more carefully and post my comments a bit closer to the
> > next weekend. (Sorry, I can't do it earlier).
> Now the following subpatches have the highest priority:
> 3. configurations class
> 4. modification of check-init-parameters rule
> 5. new configure rule
> Do you think that my ideas are going to change these patches? What is
> the status of these patches?
> Are they blocked just due to the lack of feedback from David and Volodya?
If there are patches that requires my review, or comments, or whatever and
block your work, just send them again, or ping me off-list. I must admit that
you and Alexey had very intestive discussion and I lost track of it.
> Can you repost them here, each one in a separate thread?
Would be nice.
-- Vladimir Prus http://vladimir_prus.blogspot.com Boost.Build V2: http://boost.org/boost-build2
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk