From: Andrey Melnikov (melnikov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-22 15:39:53
David Abrahams wrote:
> Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>On Thursday 22 September 2005 17:45, David Abrahams wrote:
>>>Andrey Melnikov <melnikov_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>>>If the general idea is good, what about this:
>>>>If your platform isn't in the list, or if you
>>>>downloaded the latest Boost beta sources from CVS instead of an
>>> I prefer "are using a copy of the Boost sources that is still under
>>> active development," since this does not only apply to "beta" and it
>>> does not only apply to "the latest" and because a development state
>>> of the sources may have been acquired other than through CVS,
>>> e.g. from some administrator that did the CVS and then produced a
>>> tarball, and because we're going to switch off of CVS soon anyway.
>>What about "or if you're using in-development version", then?
> You need to indicate a development version of _what_.
> "or if you are using a development version of the Boost Sources"
> would be fine.
Can/should I post/submit a docbook patch then?
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk