Re: [jamboost] Re: [BBv2 docs editorial] Installation

From: Andrey Melnikov (melnikov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-22 15:39:53

David Abrahams wrote:
> Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:
> 
> 
>>On Thursday 22 September 2005 17:45, David Abrahams wrote:
>>
>>>Andrey Melnikov <melnikov_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>>
>>>>If the general idea is good, what about this:
>>>>
>>>>-------
>>>>
>>>>If your platform isn't in the list, or if you
>>>>downloaded the latest Boost beta sources from CVS instead of an
>>>
>>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>
>>> I prefer "are using a copy of the Boost sources that is still under
>>> active development," since this does not only apply to "beta" and it
>>> does not only apply to "the latest" and because a development state
>>> of the sources may have been acquired other than through CVS,
>>> e.g. from some administrator that did the CVS and then produced a
>>> tarball, and because we're going to switch off of CVS soon anyway.
>>
>>What about "or if you're using in-development version", then?
> 
> 
> You need to indicate a development version of _what_.
> 
> "or if you are using a development version of the Boost Sources"
> 
> would be fine.
> 
Can/should I post/submit a docbook patch then?

Andrey