From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-10-14 06:32:19
Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
[Gennadiy, I've accidentally first sent this message
personally, not on list. Sorry for duplicate copy]
> "Vladimir Prus" <ghost_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
>>> IMO c++-compile-command is misleading. What you are looking for is "path
>>> to the compiler executable"
>> Why? It's exactly the command that can be executed to compile C++
> No. Exact command includes whole nine yards of options, while this is onlt
> path to the executable. Am I wrong?
Well, wether a command includes options or not is not universally agreed on.
Â Â Â Â C:/a/b/c/d.exe
path to the executable, IMO, is C:/a/b/c
Further, you can very well provide something like:
Â Â Â Â my_gcc_wrapper --time-limit=10 C:/a/b/c/d.exe
as command, which is clearly not a path at all.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk