Subject: [Boost-build] boost 1.44 is this a dodgy release ?
From: Avi Bahra (avibahra_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-09-21 13:09:05
Problems migrating to boost 1.44 (from boost 1.43)
Am I right in assuming this this known bad release ?
On Linux: serialization of date/time broken, i.e gcc 4.2.1 and gcc 4.5
error: there are no arguments to make_nvp that depend on a template
parameter, so a declaration of make_nvp must be available
On Aix: boost build fails for file system, looks like new v3 filesystem broken.
"./boost/filesystem/v3/path.hpp", line 476.7: 1540-0716 (S) The
template argument "boost::iterator" does not match the template
parameter "class Derived".
If these are known issues should I just wait for boost 1.45 ?
Also wondering if the release notes should say for each lib
what compilers it was tested against.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk