Subject: Re: [Boost-build] boost 1.44 is this a dodgy release ?
From: Steve M. Robbins (steve_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-09-21 14:19:54
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 06:09:05PM +0100, Avi Bahra wrote:
> Problems migrating to boost 1.44 (from boost 1.43)
> Am I right in assuming this this known bad release ?
> On Linux: serialization of date/time broken, i.e gcc 4.2.1 and gcc 4.5
There are certainly a wealth of issues with gcc 4.5. I've built it
fine with gcc 4.4.4 on linux, albeit with a number of patches:
I can't recall whether any of these fixed build errors for gcc 4.4.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk