Subject: Re: [Boost-build] boost 1.44 is this a dodgy release ?
From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-09-21 13:55:43
On Tuesday 21 September 2010 21:09:05 Avi Bahra wrote:
> Problems migrating to boost 1.44 (from boost 1.43)
> Am I right in assuming this this known bad release ?
> On Linux: serialization of date/time broken, i.e gcc 4.2.1 and gcc 4.5
> error: there are no arguments to âmake_nvpâ that depend on a template
> parameter, so a declaration of âmake_nvpâ must be available
> On Aix: boost build fails for file system, looks like new v3 filesystem broken.
> "./boost/filesystem/v3/path.hpp", line 476.7: 1540-0716 (S) The
> template argument "boost::iterator" does not match the template
> parameter "class Derived".
> If these are known issues should I just wait for boost 1.45 ?
I am afraid I don't know -- you might want to ask on boost-users about general impression
> Also wondering if the release notes should say for each lib
> what compilers it was tested against.
All of Boost is tested against the same set of compilers. There must
be some link to test results with 1.44, but I don't immediately know
-- Vladimir Prus http://vladimir_prus.blogspot.com Boost.Build: http://boost.org/boost-build2
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk