Subject: Re: [Boost-docs] Boost-wide concept docs
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-02-03 18:39:52
On 3 February 2011 16:52, Edward Diener <eldiener_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Agreed. Even more so it argues a common format to define a concept as part
> of documentation. I have seen concepts mentioned in documentation for many
> Boost libraries but I never knew how to document a concept for what I myself
> may be working on. Does Boost specify a preferred common format for
> documenting a concept anywhere ?
If you look in 'tools/boostbook/xsl/caramel' you'll find some xsl
stylesheets for generating concept documentation. I've never looked
into using them. I don't think there's a documented common format, but
there might be some conventions in existing libraries.
>> Arguably, the proper place for the definition of
>> PolymorphicFunctionObject is in Boost.Result_of's docs. But if we do
>> that, we have to accept the fact that when building the pdf doc of, say,
>> Fusion, the links to the concept will be broken. Kinda sucky.
> Can not PDF docs have links to HTML urls ? To other PDFs ?
If you correctly set '<format>pdf:<xsl:param>boost.url.prefix' in your
Jamfile, relative urls should be converted to links to the site.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : 2017-11-11 08:50:41 UTC