Subject: Re: [Boost-docs] Doxygen /tparam tag not working?
From: Vicente BOTET (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-03-31 16:19:49
> Message du 31/03/11 18:10
> De : "Steven Watanabe"
> A : "Discussion of Boost Documentation"
> Copie Ã :
> Objet : Re: [Boost-docs] Doxygen /tparam tag not working?
> On 03/31/2011 09:01 AM, John Maddock wrote:
> >>> Folks, I'm trying to get to grips with the "Doxygenated" Pool lib docs
> >>> (in the sandbox) and notice that template params documented with \tparam
> >>> don't appear in the output. Is this a known issue? Or is there some
> >>> other way we should be documentating class template params?
> >> As it happens, I ran into this a few days ago too.
> >> I fixed it locally, unfortunately, the BoostBook
> >> template-parameter element can only have a
> >> not a , so I'm not entirely happy
> >> with it.
> > Any old definition-list would work for me ;-)
> With the current BoostBook stylesheets, purpose
> ends up as a comment in the synopsis (just as
> with typedefs). I don't really like this, since
> it clutters the synopsis if the description is
> more than a few words. (Okay, it didn't even wrap
> properly. I had to fix it to indent and add //
> when it started a new line.).
Hi, I saw it also. This was one of the reason I started to define some doxygen aliases to manage with parameters. BTW, the @see tag didn't worked neither.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : 2017-11-11 08:50:41 UTC