[Boost-docs] A downside of qbk

Subject: [Boost-docs] A downside of qbk
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-11-06 18:40:32

I've been meaning to point out the difference between


As long as qbk is a full-fledged programming language, we may never be
able to expect better. Any ideas? Does anyone think we can possibly
convince GitHub to include a qbk processor?

Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : 2017-11-11 08:50:41 UTC