Subject: Re: [Boost-docs] A downside of qbk
From: Bo Jensen (jensen.bo_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-11-06 20:07:30
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Dave Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I've been meaning to point out the difference between
> As long as qbk is a full-fledged programming language, we may never be
> able to expect better. Any ideas? Does anyone think we can possibly
> convince GitHub to include a qbk processor?
Have no idea if that's possible, but damn it would be nice !
> Dave Abrahams
> BoostPro Computing
> Boost-docs mailing list
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : 2017-11-11 08:50:41 UTC