Re: [Boost-docs] A downside of qbk

Subject: Re: [Boost-docs] A downside of qbk
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-11-06 21:21:04

on Sun Nov 06 2011, Dave Abrahams <> wrote:

> I've been meaning to point out the difference between
> As long as qbk is a full-fledged programming language, we may never be
> able to expect better. Any ideas? Does anyone think we can possibly
> convince GitHub to include a qbk processor?

Actually, I just had an idea: make sure that qbk is an extension of
markdown syntax, which IMO is winning the wiki-like syntax wars. Then
we could get reasonable rendering for many things even where there's no
qbk support at all.

Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : 2017-11-11 08:50:41 UTC