Re: [Boost-docs] A downside of qbk

Subject: Re: [Boost-docs] A downside of qbk
From: Mateusz Łoskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-11-06 20:12:51

On 6 November 2011 20:07, Bo Jensen <jensen.bo_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Dave Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> I've been meaning to point out the difference between
>> As long as qbk is a full-fledged programming language, we may never be
>> able to expect better.  Any ideas?  Does anyone think we can possibly
>> convince GitHub to include a qbk processor?
> Have no idea if that's possible, but damn it would be nice !

That would be great!

Best regards,

Mateusz Loskot,
Charter Member of OSGeo,
Member of ACCU,

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : 2017-11-11 08:50:41 UTC