Re: [Boost-maint] [EXTERNAL] PING: Another patch request

Subject: Re: [Boost-maint] [EXTERNAL] PING: Another patch request
From: Marshall Clow (mclow.lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-02-06 09:04:53

On Feb 6, 2014, at 4:29 AM, Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 2:44 AM, Ahmed Charles <acharles_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> 
>>> From: mclow.lists_at_[hidden]
>>> Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 19:14:25 -0800
>>> To: boost-maint_at_[hidden]
>>> Subject: Re: [Boost-maint] [EXTERNAL]  PING: Another patch request
>>> 
>>> This is the workflow I’m trying to build here in the group.
>>> 
>>> Someone proposes a change, others review it.
>>> But it won’t work if no one looks at other people’s changes.
>> 
>> I got the mail, but there wasn't a patch attached, otherwise I would've
>> looked at it.
>> 
> 
> IIRC, the oddly named GitHub "Gist" mechanism gives us a place to put
> patches if passing them around as attachments is too cumbersome.
> 
> Perhaps someone could document how this works. I'm totally tied up for the
> next couple of weeks with C++ committee meeting and related work.

Me, too ;-) 

I’ll put it on my list, but I won’t get to it for at least two weeks.
If someone else wants to document it, that would be great.

— Marshall