|
Boost Testing : |
From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (agurtovoy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-11 17:49:33
Jonathan Turkanis writes:
>
> I'm trying to understand the relationship between the results posted
> under "Linux: Martin Wille" here:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/3rnxo
>
> and the results for iostreams which are displayed here:
>
> http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/cs-Linux.html
>
> In particular, the platforms look exactly the same,
They are.
> but while the
> former shows many tests failing, the latter shows all but three
> passing.
There is some latency (2-3 hours) in integrating individual results
into Boost wide reports, but...
> Furthermore, the former is dated yesterday but the results
> seem to reflect the state of CVS several days ago.
.. this one doesn't sound right. I'm afraid Martin is in a better
position to comment on this one.
>
> Finally, the 'unresolved issues' for iostreams:
>
> http://www.meta-comm.com/engineering/boost-regression/developer/issues.h
> tml
>
> is inconsistent with both of the above.
Can you please elaborate? They seem perfectly consistent to me.
-- Aleksey Gurtovoy MetaCommunications Engineering