Boost Testing :
From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-29 11:08:26
> Any one any ideas why this test is failing for the Metacom testers only
> (given the limitation that this test depends on program_options which
> seems to have quite a few regressions at present).
> Looking at http://tinyurl.com/a63wt it seems as though the test is being
> invoked without the correct command line argument, which would indicate a
> broken Jamfile, however it works locally for me (Note: if Metacom have
> switched to bjam --v2, then that Jamfile *was* broken: I've just fixed it,
> but the error should have been different if that had been the case).
On second thoughts the errors seem to have cleared, so maybe my fix to the
v2 Jamfile was needed after all...