Boost Testing :
From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (agurtovoy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-30 08:39:11
John Maddock writes:
>> Any one any ideas why this test is failing for the Metacom testers
>> only (given the limitation that this test depends on program_options
>> which seems to have quite a few regressions at present).
>> Looking at http://tinyurl.com/a63wt it seems as though the test is
>> being invoked without the correct command line argument, which would
>> indicate a broken Jamfile, however it works locally for me (Note: if
>> Metacom have switched to bjam --v2, then that Jamfile *was* broken:
>> I've just fixed it, but the error should have been different if that
>> had been the case).
> On second thoughts the errors seem to have cleared, so maybe my fix to
> the v2 Jamfile was needed after all...
We did not switch to v2 yet, so I'm not sure what helped here.
-- Aleksey Gurtovoy MetaCommunications Engineering