Boost Testing :
From: Martin Wille (mw8329_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-09 02:01:21
Hartmut Kaiser wrote:
>>I have no idea what is happening here. Even if the 1.32
>>version of libboost_wave would get used, the results of the
>>automated and the manual runs should still be consistent.
> That's because the testwave app needs '-I$(BOOST_ROOT) -S$(BOOST_ROOT)' on
> the command line additionally (expand the BOOST_ROOT var).
OK, I tried with that, too:
exception caught: unknown option long_long
testwave: 167 of 169 test(s) succeeded (2 test(s) failed).
This is still inconsistent. However, t_9_014.cpp got updated after the
test binary was built:
-r--r--r-- 1 m m 547 May 8 18:11 t_9_014.cpp
-rwx--x--x 1 m m 64626929 May 8 09:21 testwave*