Boost Testing :
From: Victor A. Wagner Jr. (vawjr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-02 07:26:11
At 10:59 2005-06-01, Bronek Kozicki wrote:
>Victor A. Wagner Jr. wrote:
>>seems to be no reason for it. I'd certainly like to hear a defense of
>>the decision to cause a program failure if the date being output is
>maybe because they have better function and type for wider range of times,
>namely localtime64 and __time64_t ? Moreover, this limitation applies also
>to older versions of MSVC, see following comment from localtim.c :
>(3) It is assumed that time_t is a 32-bit long integer representing
>the number of seconds since 00:00:00, 01-01-70 (UTC) (i.e., the
>Posix/Unix Epoch. Only non-negative values are supported.
>Above comment is present in CRT sources of both MSVC6 and MSVC71. I do not
>know how this relates to standards in *nix world.
One has to wonder why the test functions in 7.1 then and fails in
8.0. Surely you don't imply that the older libraries were "better".
Victor A. Wagner Jr. http://rudbek.com
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
"There oughta be a law"