Boost Testing :
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-28 06:23:15
Aleksey Gurtovoy <agurtovoy_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> Yipes! I hope things haven't become worse!
> They became better in a sense that your changes finally made the
> dependencies in question straightforwardly trackable, but at the same
> time process_jam_log still required some tweaking to pick these up.
>>>> I think the cause of that one must be different from that of all the
>>>> others. Can you explain it?
>>> I'll try to take a deeper look at what's up here later tonight.
> I've just checked in a fix to process_jam_log which, together with
> your changes, should finally make the issue go away. Our regularly
> scheduled regression run is currently somewhere in the middle, though,
> so the new results reflecting this will be on the web only sometime
> around tomorrow afternoon.
Thanks a lot, Aleksey!
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com