Boost logo

Boost Testing :

From: Jim Douglas (jim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-31 06:32:14


John Maddock wrote:
> ... (BTW shouldn't you be testing the CVS HEAD, we
> probably shouldn't be making too many substantive changes to the release
> branch at this stage for a new compiler) ...

There has been some discussion elsewhere in the newsgroup about this and
the consensus appears to be that I should continue testing RC_1_33_0 for
now. Naturally, I will fall into line with whatever collective decision
is made in the future ...

PS Thanks for the input. I will respond to the other points soon.

Jim


Boost-testing list run by mbergal at meta-comm.com