Boost logo

Boost Testing :

From: Bronek Kozicki (brok_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-03 18:19:10

Thomas Witt wrote:
> vc-6_5
> vc-6_5-stlport
> vc-7_0
> vc-7_1-stlport
> msvc-7.1
> msvc-8.0

do we need this inconsistency in toolset names (vc- vs. msvc- ) ? What about
vc-7_0-stlport ? What about vc-6_5-dinkum ? Do we have toolset for Digital Mars ?

> mingw-3_4_2
> mingw-3_4_5

What about mingw-3_4_2-stlport and mingw-3_4_5-stlport ?

I ask because I might be able (in some, not well defined, future) to run tests
for almost any (but not all - I have not enough CPU power) of these.


Boost-testing list run by mbergal at