|
Boost Testing : |
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-04 07:41:10
Bronek Kozicki <brok_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Thomas Witt wrote:
>> vc-6_5
>> vc-6_5-stlport
>> vc-7_0
>> vc-7_1-stlport
>> msvc-7.1
>> msvc-8.0
>
> do we need this inconsistency in toolset names (vc- vs. msvc- ) ? What about
> vc-7_0-stlport ? What about vc-6_5-dinkum ? Do we have toolset for Digital Mars ?
such inconsistencies should all be gone now that we're switching to
BBv2. If any remain it should only be because some testers haven't
made the switch.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com