Boost Testing :
From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-06 00:56:05
Bronek Kozicki wrote:
> Thomas Witt wrote:
> do we need this inconsistency in toolset names (vc- vs. msvc- ) ? What about
> vc-7_0-stlport ? What about vc-6_5-dinkum ? Do we have toolset for Digital Mars ?
For some of those we simply don't have tests. I choose not to include
Digital Mars because it's still way off.
> What about mingw-3_4_2-stlport and mingw-3_4_5-stlport ?
Are you still running mingw-3_4_4-stlport-5_0 we could add that to the list.
> I ask because I might be able (in some, not well defined, future) to run tests
> for almost any (but not all - I have not enough CPU power) of these.
Sorry but the cut-off date for testing platforms is now. Begging _might_
push it to the day after tomorrow.
-- Thomas Witt witt_at_[hidden]