Boost logo

Boost Testing :

From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-06 00:51:36

David Abrahams wrote:
> Bronek Kozicki <brok_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> Thomas Witt wrote:
>>> vc-6_5
>>> vc-6_5-stlport
>>> vc-7_0
>>> vc-7_1-stlport
>>> msvc-7.1
>>> msvc-8.0
>> do we need this inconsistency in toolset names (vc- vs. msvc- ) ? What about
>> vc-7_0-stlport ? What about vc-6_5-dinkum ? Do we have toolset for Digital Mars ?
> such inconsistencies should all be gone now that we're switching to
> BBv2. If any remain it should only be because some testers haven't
> made the switch.

May I ask that any tester changing the toolset name please apply the
necessary changes to explicit-failures-markup.xml and give me a heads up
by email.



Thomas Witt

Boost-testing list run by mbergal at