Re: [Boost-testing] [Fwd: [1.34.0] Atte testers, optional TESTS CHANGED]

From: Victor A. Wagner Jr. (vawjr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-23 01:06:30

At 22:42 2007-03-22, Thomas Witt wrote:

>Hi,
>
>Several testers haven't picked up on this yet. Could you please make 
>sure these are no longer reported.

what are we supposed to "pick up" on?

>Thanks
>
>Thomas
>
>-------- Original Message --------
>Subject: [1.34.0] Atte testers, optional TESTS CHANGED
>Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 08:54:40 -0300
>From: Fernando Cacciola <fernando_cacciola_at_[hidden]>
>Reply-To: boost_at_[hidden]
>To: boost_at_[hidden]
>Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel
>References: <45F21FA2.5090001_at_[hidden]>
>
>Hello testers,
>
>The following tests have been removed from
>
>optional/test/Jamfile.v2
>
>     [ compile-fail optional_test_fail2.cpp ]
>     [ compile-fail optional_test_ref_fail2.cpp ]
>
>
>Best
>
>Fernando Cacciola
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>
>
>--
>Thomas Witt
>witt_at_[hidden]
>

Victor A. Wagner Jr.      http://rudbek.com
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
               "There oughta be a law"