Boost Testing :
Subject: Re: [Boost-testing] pathscale 3.1 reporting problems?
From: Christopher Cambly (ccambly_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-06-16 18:04:06
> This test is expected to fail (it tests how Boost.Test handles
> division by zero)
> and if it's not this is an error. That's all.
FWIW I'm not a fan of this test. xlC/PPC hardware does not trap on div.
We can fix it easy by adding an option to generate a trap and did so in
Boost 1.34.1 but never bothered for the Boost development line.
XL C++ Compiler Development