Re: boost::pool + shared memory

From: xpav_2000 (alex_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-29 21:00:41

--- In Boost-Users_at_y..., Tom Matelich <tmatelich_at_z...> wrote:
> Looks like pool may not be what I need, darn.  I like 
> to weasel as many boost classes into my project as possible.  

I've got a similar question -- I've got a whole pile of strings that 
I want to share between processes, and I was thinking a reference-
counted string implementation with the actual data in shared memory 
would be a good way to do that.

Do you think a memory pool placed in shared memory, with the string 
class modified to allocate/deallocate there would work?