Re: [Boost-Users] Re: Efficient implementation of associative_property_map

From: Martin Okrslar (okrslar_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-05 08:20:00

Tarjei Knapstad wrote:
[snip]

>>We don't have SGI STL around here. I've seen that before, but I hoped
>>that there would be an other way than changing my STL version... It's
>>amazing that there is no hashtable in the stdc++, isn't it?
>>
>>    
>>
>More or less... :) Hashed containers were introduced too late to make it
>into the standard IIRC, allthough most STL implementations have them and
>most STL books document them.
>
>I believe you can be pretty certain they'll make it into the next
>standard though :)
>
>I'd be interested to know which STL implementation it is you are using
>that don't have hashed containers? I would strongly consider switching
>to STLport for instance.
>
I am what comes with gcc 3.2. Now that you told me, I had a look into 
our /package/gcc-3.2/linux/include/c++/3.2/ext/
directory, and there is it.

Great! Thanks!
 Martin

>
>Regards,
>--
>Tarjei
>
>
>
>Info: <http://www.boost.org>
>Wiki: <http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl>
>Unsubscribe: <mailto:boost-users-unsubscribe_at_[hidden]>
> 
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
>
>
>  
>

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Martin Okrslar
MPI for Molecular Genetics          phone: ++ 49 + 30 / 8413-1166
Computational Molecular Biology     Fax:   ++ 49 + 30 / 8413-1152
Ihnestrasse 73                      email: okrslar_at_[hidden]
D-14195 Berlin                      URL:   http://cmb.molgen.mpg.de
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------