Re: [Boost-Users] Re: boost::date_time::posix_time and Intel Compiler 7.0?

From: adutoit (adutoit_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-05-26 02:31:28

I think I finally sorted out my previous compile errors when I changed the
order in which my include directories are searched.  But now I get errors
relating to STLPort and Qt...  So I'll probably continue this saga on the
STLPort
mailing list!

Thanks anyway.

A.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Markus Werle" <yg-boost-users_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost-users_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2003 8:59 PM
Subject: [Boost-Users] Re: boost::date_time::posix_time and Intel Compiler
7.0?

> adutoit wrote:
>
> > [ a lot of trouble using boost and Intel C++ ]
>
> Since I had no time to "configure" Intel's compiler
> and since I was so fed up with getting it up and running,
> I did 2 things with Intel-7.0 on linux which work for me:
>
> I use -ansi and -DBOOST_NO_CONFIG.
> Though the latter might be a bad idea in general
> (since no special platform-dependent optimization
> can be used then) this solved a lot of trouble,
> especially since some parts of boost make (made?) assumptions
> about Intel's behaviour that no longer hold.
>
> >From my own experience, if it compiles with gcc-3.2 -ansi
> it should never fail with Intel's compiler except when the code
> is not completely compliant. At present I use gcc only for the
> much more intelligent error messages for templates.
>
> If You could provide a small code snippet which
> shows this error I can try to compile it under Linux
> and see what is happening there.
>
>
> Markus
>
>
>
> --
>
> Compile time analytic differentiation?
> Yes, at http://daixtrose.sourceforge.net/
>
>
>
> Info: <http://www.boost.org>
> Wiki: <http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl>
> Unsubscribe: <mailto:boost-users-unsubscribe_at_[hidden]>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>