Re: Newbee: Build/Installation Questions

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-06-16 07:59:02

Moving this thread to Jamboost...

Adalbert Perbandt <adalbert.perbandt_at_[hidden]> writes:

>>>>>> "David" == David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
>
>     >>  Hmm, seems to me if I misunderstood something. I found a set
>     >> of so called "Pseudotargets: described in the
>     >> tools/build/jam_src/Jambase.html page.
>
>     David> We should probably get rid of that; it only applies to
>     David> "Classic Jam", not Boost.Build.  But anyway, pseudotargets
>     David> are not the same as build variants.
>
> O.k. As far as I understand build variants are configured using the
> BUILD environment variable (or the -sBUILD=...) option, correct?

Right.

> Until now I know of the variants "debug" and "release". And obviously
> one can specify some modifiers like "<optimization>speed" or
> "<runtime-link>static|dynamic>", "<debug-symbols>on" and maybe more. I
> think it should be very simple to find out which build variants and
> modifiers are defined because this information must be stored in some
> of the Jam config files. Correct?

see tools/build/features.jam

> Just searched through the boost_1_30_0 directories and found such info
> in the Toolset jam files, e. g. tools/build/sunpro-tools.jam. Somehow
> a default set of these modifiers must exist for the case that the user
> did not specify anyone(?)

The variant specifies the first layer of defaults.  Anything not in
the variant is taken from the feature's first value.  Finally, target
requirements may override those values.

>     >> In between I followed your hint in a reply to another question
>     >> and specified the installation directory like this:
>     >> 
>     >> $ bjam -sTOOLS=sunpro -sALL_LOCATE_TARGET=<installDir>
>     >> 
>     >> [...]
>     David> Nope.  Being able to isolate header dependencies and
>     David> separate them from the rest of Boost is not a feature we
>     David> have implemented.  Boost is meant to be installed "en
>     David> masse"
>
> O.k. I think, this is an acceptable solution because all the Boost
> libs might be very useful -- if I only could get them all compiled
> with Sun's Forte compiler:-((( 

Sun has a lot of bugs to fix before that can happen.

> [...]
>     David> I'm sure.  We'd appreciate your participation in the
>     David> Boost.Build v2 project.  See
>     David> http://www.boost.org/more/mailing_lists.htm to get on the
>     David> mailing list.
>
> Thanks, just subscribed to the jamboost Boost Build mailing list. I'm still
> very new to the build tool BJam. So first I have to learn more about
> its functioning before being able to contribute.
>
> Regards,
>
> Adalbert Perbandt.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com