|
Boost Users : |
From: Rene Rivera (grafik.list_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-24 22:33:28
Mart marvin wrote:
> Now that's silly. When did ".h" stop being good enough!? Well it did
> compile so I can't complain too hard...but why change it to hpp? I
> can understand modern C++ has benefits over the older like that when
> memory allocation fails it throws a bad_alloc, but changing things like
> "h" to "hpp" is just changing for the sake of change.
Without looking at the content... How would you tell the difference
between a C language header and C++ language header?
I'm not trying to start some language or naming war... Just pointing out
the obvious reasoning. And everyone is free to ignore this message ;-)
-- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - Grafik/jabber.org
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net