|
Boost Users : |
From: Jens Theisen (jth01_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-01-23 14:26:00
monade wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm using vc.net with a tool called "Visual Leak Detector". [...]
I found the explanation in the archives of this list.
The VLD isn't reporting a genuine leak but the allocation of a singleton.
This dynamic allocation isn't freed, but it will always be only one
allocation, so it's not a leak.
This leaves two questions, however.
1. Why the VLD is not reporting the non-deallocation in case of using
automatic storage for boost::thread rather than dynamic. As far as I can
see, this shouldn't make a difference. In fact, there as now way for
boost::thread to tell which storage class it has.
2. How you can tell VLD to stop complaining about this particular non-
deallocation.
I'd be interested in the answers, but I can't help you on that since I
don't have this platform.
Jens
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net