Re: [Boost-users] Spawning a thread on a member function

From: Sliwa, Przemyslaw (London) (Przemyslaw_Sliwa_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-01-30 11:59:21

Can I spawn the thread within another member function? I believe it
should be not a problem. 

Thanks

Kind regards

Pshemek 

 

Przemyslaw Sliwa 
Global Foreign Exchange 

FX Risk Engine Development
Merrill Lynch 
(   [phone] 
)         +44  (0)79 6325 2319
*   Email: przemyslaw_sliwa_at_[hidden]

-----Original Message-----
From: boost-users-bounces_at_[hidden]
[mailto:boost-users-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Patrick
Sent: 27 January 2006 23:03
To: boost-users_at_[hidden]
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Spawning a thread on a member function

You are correct the "boost::ref(*this)" is not needed.

Simple(boost::bind(&Simple::run, this))
{}

-----Original Message-----
From: boost-users-bounces_at_[hidden]
[mailto:boost-users-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Christian
Henning
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 4:47 PM
To: boost-users_at_[hidden]
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Spawning a thread on a member function

This is even simpler. Is there is reason for "boost::ref(*this)" ?

class Simple
{
   Simple() : th( boost::bind( run, this ))
   {}

   void run()
   {
         for(;;){
               //Thread's work goes here.
         }
   }

private:

   boost::thread th;
};

_______________________________________________
Boost-users mailing list
Boost-users_at_[hidden]
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users

_______________________________________________
Boost-users mailing list
Boost-users_at_[hidden]
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
--------------------------------------------------------

If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retain or redistribute it. Click here for important additional terms relating to this e-mail.     http://www.ml.com/email_terms/
--------------------------------------------------------