Boost Users :
From: Jim Douglas (jim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-02-04 05:30:25
Drumheller, Michael wrote:
> Main stumbling point for me was bjam. It's not so much of a problem for
> building the libraries themselves--you don't need to know anything about
> it at all, really. But when you start building your own extensions, it
> would be helpful to have a dozen or so examples of really basic
> operations, like changing the destination directory, defining a
> preprocessor macro on the compiler command line, stuff like that.
> I have to say, I'm almost embarrassed to be writing this, because it
> seems like nobody on this list ever complains about bjam. So maybe it's
> just me. But to me, bjam is an incomprehensible monster, a big YALITTC
> (yet-another-link-in-the-tool-chain) that just makes it harder to sell
> boost within an organization.
Perhaps people don't complain because most only use bjam it to build the
libraries (archives and shared objects) and then (like me) they use
'make' to build the projects that incorporate Boost. I would guess that
you are in the minority if you write in-house extensions to the Boost
Having said that, I can appreciate that bjam is a *very* powerful tool
and has many advantages over make, but I just can't find the time to
study the docs enough to make a trial switch.
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net