|
Boost Users : |
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Already successfully running Boost on Linux, looking for advice from Windows Boost adopters
From: Ramon F Herrera (ramon_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-10-14 18:10:42
I have a quick feedback. AFAIAC and with all due respect, Boost on the
Windows side is not ready for prime time.
As an example: I registered in the BoostPro site, downloaded the
installer and ran it. It looks spiffy: I got the choice to select among
the myriad Windows options (DLL, multi-thread, debug, etc.). I selected
"MSVC++ 2005" and yet got a hodgepodge of older and newer Visual Studio
solutions. The newer ones are not recognized my IDE.
Having said that, I am quite impressed by the BoostPro initiative, and
it is reassuring to see that the boost founders are part of it. I am
sure we will see great things from them.
As I grow old^H^H^H, err- wiser, I tend not to be on the "bleeding
edge". I definitely won't be among the cowboys up front fending the
indians (pardon: native Americans, but armed with arrows).
The Uni*x version builds and works great, though.
-Ramon "Never use version 1.0 of anything" Herrera
Ramon F Herrera wrote:
>
> Some weeks ago, Boost caught my attention, and I am now a more than
> satisfied user. The assistance received in this forum is one of the
> factors in my "two thumbs up" evaluation of Boost. Give yourselves a
> round of applause. :^)
>
> Since I can't help but getting into progressively harder stuff (i.e.,
> getting into trouble), I am considering using Boost on the Windows side.
> My background is Unix development but I have been teaching myself Visual
> C++ lately. I mostly build and integrate stuff written by other
> programmers.
>
> I am trying to decide whether I should delve deeper into Boost on the
> Linux side (which is quickly becoming a walk in the park), or take the
> plunge into Windows. Are there gotchas or caveats? Can I just download
> Boost and select "Build solution"?
>
> My current platform is Visual Studio, Version 8 (2005). I don't intend
> to upgrade it until I have no choice. I have found that to be a safe
> policy -better safe than sorry-, specially when the software comes from
> Redmond.
>
> -Ramon
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net