Re: [Boost-users] Is Boost-CMake Dead or Alive?

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Is Boost-CMake Dead or Alive?
From: Manfred Doudar (manfred.doudar_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-08-28 03:44:28

On Sat, 28 Aug 2010 11:12:49 +0400
Vladimir Prus <vladimir_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> David Abrahams wrote:
> 
> > At Thu, 26 Aug 2010 13:41:46 -0400,
> > Eric Niebler wrote:
> >> 
> >> Even if we achieve our vision, it's not clear that Boost as an
> >> organization will adopt it.
> > 
> > <ahem>
> > 
> > A small correction: even *when* we achieve our vision, there's no
> > *guarantee* that Boost will adopt it.
> > 
> > [But Boost will adopt it.  Just promise not to sue us in case they
> > don't :-)]
> 

[snip..]

> 
> I think Eric statement is much more balanced.
> 

+1

In the spirit of Boost openness, re adoption of libraries,
technologies, or whatever, I have to agree with Vladimir's perceptions,
and equally accurate statement that Eric's line was /much more balanced/

Cheers,
-- 
Manfred