Re: [Boost-users] Request for an addition in Boost Coding standard

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Request for an addition in Boost Coding standard
From: Gokulakannan Somasundaram (gokul007_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-06-17 00:14:55

On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 3:55 PM, <Viatcheslav.Sysoltsev_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Yeah, and I would like to fine override some libc functions for just some
> classes: maybe all boost functions should have all possible libc function
> pointers as optional parameters? Just accept you're trying to do something
> unordinary, which is not worthy to support generally. IMO of course. Try to
> implement what you need through compiler support or some cunny
> compiler/linker tricks.
>
>
For being rational, Boost Pool Allocator is being provided by Boost. So do
you mean to say that a person using the Boost Pool allocator should refrain
from using other Boost libraries and declare that he is doing something
'unordinary'. All it takes to implement the allocator support in most cases
is a typedef. I can't understand the reasoning behind your argument.

Thanks.