Re: UUID

From: Ming Cheng (chengm349_at_[hidden])
Date: 2021-07-29 04:53:17

It's a very very big exchange. I don't think I can persuade it to change(?). Now let's focus on 64-bit UUID. Can do by boost? As I mentioned before, let me hold responsible for mis-usage. you experience people just help.

________________________________
From: Boost-users <boost-users-bounces_at_[hidden]> on behalf of Gavin Lambert via Boost-users <boost-users_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2021 3:07 AM
To: boost-users_at_[hidden] <boost-users_at_[hidden]>
Cc: Gavin Lambert <boost_at_[hidden]>
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] UUID

On 29/07/2021 9:16 am, chengm349 wrote:
> so boost uuid can't support compromised uuid needs?

Don't make something look like a uuid if it's not actually a uuid.  That
road leads to pain and torment.

Go back to the customer and clarify the requirement, it's likely they
can be persuaded to do things better.
_______________________________________________
Boost-users mailing list
Boost-users_at_[hidden]
https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users